<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Notes from UniqueTracks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uniquetracks.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uniquetracks.com/blog</link>
	<description>The blog of the UniqueTracks Production Music Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 02:17:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Independent Filmmaker fights online piracy by Ellen Seidler &#8211; And Then Came Lola (2009) &#124; Wayne Borean</title>
		<link>http://www.uniquetracks.com/blog/intellectual-property/copyright/independent-filmmaker-fights-against-online-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-7470</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Seidler &#8211; And Then Came Lola (2009) &#124; Wayne Borean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 02:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniquetracks.com/blog/?p=574#comment-7470</guid>
		<description>[...] from September 20, 2010. Unique Tracks wrote an article that makes an interesting point &#8211; in Independent Filmaker fights online piracy it reports: Within 24 hours of the release of the DVD of “And Then Came Lola,” digital pirates [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from September 20, 2010. Unique Tracks wrote an article that makes an interesting point &#8211; in Independent Filmaker fights online piracy it reports: Within 24 hours of the release of the DVD of “And Then Came Lola,” digital pirates [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quirky New TV Jingles Aimed at Young Women by jimyounkin</title>
		<link>http://www.uniquetracks.com/blog/advertising/quirky-new-tv-jingles-aimed-at-young-women/comment-page-1/#comment-7309</link>
		<dc:creator>jimyounkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 05:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniquetracks.com/blog/?p=853#comment-7309</guid>
		<description>The singer reminds me a lot of Kimya Dawson who&#039;s music I found from the Juno Soundtrack.

Here is one of her songs on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvkBSDeRRpw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The singer reminds me a lot of Kimya Dawson who&#8217;s music I found from the Juno Soundtrack.</p>
<p>Here is one of her songs on youtube: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvkBSDeRRpw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvkBSDeRRpw</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Swiff it good &#8211; the music industry in chaos by Quirky New TV Jingles Aimed at Young Women &#171; Notes from UniqueTracks</title>
		<link>http://www.uniquetracks.com/blog/intellectual-property/music-licensing/swiff-it-good-the-music-industry-in-chaos/comment-page-1/#comment-6942</link>
		<dc:creator>Quirky New TV Jingles Aimed at Young Women &#171; Notes from UniqueTracks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniquetracks.com/blog/intellectual-property/music-licensing/swiff-it-good-the-music-industry-in-chaos/#comment-6942</guid>
		<description>[...] Quirky New TV Jingles Aimed at Young Women I&#039;m a big fan of the commercial jingle as a method of advertising. I think jingles sell better than their much over-used alternative - the licensed hit song. Jingles are written directly for the ad and, to me, tend to create better campaigns.  Sidebar: Example of licensed hit song in advertising - This morning I heard Chrissie Hynde&#039;s I&#039;m Special in an ad for the new Blackberry tablet. I written about why I don&#039;t like hit songs in advertising here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quirky New TV Jingles Aimed at Young Women I&#039;m a big fan of the commercial jingle as a method of advertising. I think jingles sell better than their much over-used alternative &#8211; the licensed hit song. Jingles are written directly for the ad and, to me, tend to create better campaigns.  Sidebar: Example of licensed hit song in advertising &#8211; This morning I heard Chrissie Hynde&#039;s I&#039;m Special in an ad for the new Blackberry tablet. I written about why I don&#039;t like hit songs in advertising here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Swiff it good &#8211; the music industry in chaos by FreeCreditReport.com Jingle Power &#171; Notes from UniqueTracks</title>
		<link>http://www.uniquetracks.com/blog/intellectual-property/music-licensing/swiff-it-good-the-music-industry-in-chaos/comment-page-1/#comment-6639</link>
		<dc:creator>FreeCreditReport.com Jingle Power &#171; Notes from UniqueTracks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniquetracks.com/blog/intellectual-property/music-licensing/swiff-it-good-the-music-industry-in-chaos/#comment-6639</guid>
		<description>[...] Swiff it Good, The Music Industry in Chaos  div.rax_subscribe { width:60%; float:left; border:8px solid #EBEBEB; text-align:center; background-color:#D0E4F5; } div.rax-email-subscribe { background-color:#4086C7; padding:5px 8px; height:60px; } div.rax-email-subscribe span { color:#FFF; font-size:12px; } div.rax-email-subscribe input.rax-button { font-size:14px !important; padding:2px !important; *padding:0px; } div.rax-other-subscribe { margin:10px 5px; } div.rax-other-subscribe img { display:inline; } .clear { padding:0; margin:0; clear:both; } .rax-credit { width:60%; text-align:right; font-size:9px; color:#CCC; } .rax-credit a { text-decoration:none; font-size:9px; color:#CCC; } .rax-credit a:hover { text-decoration:none; }      Subscribe via Email [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Swiff it Good, The Music Industry in Chaos  div.rax_subscribe { width:60%; float:left; border:8px solid #EBEBEB; text-align:center; background-color:#D0E4F5; } div.rax-email-subscribe { background-color:#4086C7; padding:5px 8px; height:60px; } div.rax-email-subscribe span { color:#FFF; font-size:12px; } div.rax-email-subscribe input.rax-button { font-size:14px !important; padding:2px !important; *padding:0px; } div.rax-other-subscribe { margin:10px 5px; } div.rax-other-subscribe img { display:inline; } .clear { padding:0; margin:0; clear:both; } .rax-credit { width:60%; text-align:right; font-size:9px; color:#CCC; } .rax-credit a { text-decoration:none; font-size:9px; color:#CCC; } .rax-credit a:hover { text-decoration:none; }      Subscribe via Email [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Information Piracy and the Bottom Line by John Bickerton</title>
		<link>http://www.uniquetracks.com/blog/intellectual-property/information-piracy-and-the-bottom-line/comment-page-1/#comment-6605</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bickerton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniquetracks.com/blog/?p=624#comment-6605</guid>
		<description>I think the argument would be that 17% income is lost to &lt;b&gt;illegal &lt;/b&gt;downloads.  Therefore the channel - Internet downloads - though not one that comprises 100% of major media companies income - this new channel is taking 17% of the business from their other established channels (theater, DVD, rental, their own budding download businesses).  In other words it&#039;s 17% lost sales regardless of channel.

The other argument, that piracy actually helps media companies, is, to me,  just a rationalization by those that take part in it.  It&#039;s like saying - &quot;I stole a new TV from Walmart but then I showed all of my friends the new TV and they all thought it was cool and wanted one too.  I&#039;m helping the TV companies!&quot;  Well, tell that to the judge.  

If you want to know if media companies think piracy is helpful, give them a choice.  A world with media piracy and a world without.  Which do you think they would choose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the argument would be that 17% income is lost to <b>illegal </b>downloads.  Therefore the channel &#8211; Internet downloads &#8211; though not one that comprises 100% of major media companies income &#8211; this new channel is taking 17% of the business from their other established channels (theater, DVD, rental, their own budding download businesses).  In other words it&#8217;s 17% lost sales regardless of channel.</p>
<p>The other argument, that piracy actually helps media companies, is, to me,  just a rationalization by those that take part in it.  It&#8217;s like saying &#8211; &#8220;I stole a new TV from Walmart but then I showed all of my friends the new TV and they all thought it was cool and wanted one too.  I&#8217;m helping the TV companies!&#8221;  Well, tell that to the judge.  </p>
<p>If you want to know if media companies think piracy is helpful, give them a choice.  A world with media piracy and a world without.  Which do you think they would choose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

